Select your language

Home arrow-right Pixie Renderer

We've compiled a list of 46 free and paid alternatives to Pixie Renderer. The primary competitors include POV-Ray, LuxCoreRender. In addition to these, users also draw comparisons between Pixie Renderer and YafaRay, Mitsuba, Indigo Renderer. Also you can look at other similar options here: About.


The Persistence of Vision Raytracer is a high-quality, totally free tool for creating stunning...

LuxCoreRender
Free Open Source

LuxCoreRender is a physically based and unbiased rendering engine.

YafaRay
Free Open Source

YafaRay is a free open-source montecarlo raytracing engine released under the LGPL 2.1 license.

Indigo Renderer is an unbiased, physically based and photorealistic renderer which simulates the...

Clara.io is a full-featured cloud-based 3D modeling, animation and rendering software tool that...

Thea Render is a state-of-the-art biased/unbiased renderer with a rich set of innovative features...

Advanced Technology from Pixar Animation Studios for Rendering VFX and Animation

Octane Render is the world's first GPU based, un-biased, physically based renderer.

Pixie is an open source RenderMan renderer for generating photorealistic images.

Pixie Renderer Overview

Pixie is an open source RenderMan renderer for generating photorealistic images. You can compile Pixie on Windows (using Visual Studio 2005), Linux and on OSX (using XCode or unix style configure script).

Pixie is an open source project licensed under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).

Features:

# Object instancing / delayed primitives
# Displacements
# Programmable shading (using RenderMan Shading Language)
# High quality texture/shadow/environment mapping
# High dynamic range input/output
# Scalable, multi-resolution raytracing using ray differentials

* Pixie now has a new raytracing engine that automatically tesselates surfaces on the fly to a desired accuracy determined using the ray differentials. This means rays tracing blurry reflections or computing global illumination are faster to trace and sharp reflections and shadows are more accurate. Pixie also contains a memory manager that keeps the memory that is used to keep these tesselations around under control. Similar to texture caching, Pixie will maintain a set of active surfaces and only those surfaces will consume raytracing memory.

# Motion blur
# Depth of field
# Level of detail (LOD)
# Reyes style rendering (very fast)
# Occlusion culling
# Network parallel rendering
# DSO shaders
# Global illumination

* Pixie supports global illumination thru photon mapping and irradiance caching -- The same machinery described in the latest RenderMan interface.

# Automatically raytraced smooth reflections / shadows
# Caching/baking computation with LOD (bake3d / texture3d)

* Using this functionality, you can save any value you compute in a shader to a file that you can later re-use. This allows you to perform expensive shading computations at a lower resolution and re-use these computations in the beauty passes. This functionality will also enable exporting shading data from Pixie into your own applications.

# Scalable, multi-threaded rendering

* Pixie rendering core has been first completely reorganized/optimized and then multi-threaded. We are very proud of this change. You will see significant speed improvements over the Pixie v1.

# Arbirtaty output values

* Pixie can save arbitrary variables (built in ones such as N, P as well as arbitrary, user defined variables) just like rgb values into images. Using this machinery, you can generate multiple outputs from a single pass and combine them as a post process.

# 64 bit compatibility
# Inline archives
# Conditional execution
# Named resources

Pixie Renderer Platforms

Windows Linux Mac

Top Pixie Renderer Alternatives

Share your opinion about the software, leave a review and help make it even better!

Pixie Renderer Tags

renderman global-illumination raytracing rendering cgi

Suggest Changes

Your Feedback

Select a rating
Please select a rating

Your vote has been counted.

Do you have experience using this software?